Founder & Principal Attorney — Law Offices of Lalit K. Jain, Esq.
Lalit K. Jain, Esq. is an attorney who scripted the pragmatic Memorandum of Law (“LKJMOL”) for use in their legal briefs by all litigants (both pro se or self-represented and represented by lawyers) to help courts, with no right to commit or perpetuate scapegoatings (blaming others for wrongdoings they did not commit) and other Injustices even if courts scapegoat LKJESQ for this legal help. End abusing discretion to apply inapplicable laws to fictions as facts like marital presumptions for Injustices perpetuating unlawful unpragmatic jurisprudence (“JIP”). Use discretion to apply applicable laws to facts as truths like DNA-matches for equal justice under law to perpetuate lawful pragmatic truthisprudence (“TIP”).
Need Legal Representation?
If you believe you are still enduring Injustices perpetuated by the courts, then, please click Review My Case and send Case Review Request. We help all litigants: both pro se or self-represented and represented by lawyers.
Below is the New York City Queens County Criminal Court in the case of People v Onuorah in which the legally, ethically, morally and constitutionally duty bound trial Court made prompt self-reversal and self-correction of its judicial errors to be the historic judicial proof thereof. The Constitution of the United States (“COTUS”) requires all Federal, State and local courts in all jurisdictions, even after a lapse of more than twenty years, more so when fraud before, during and/or after due process of law made courts commit such errors, to use competent evidence and applicable law, ensure impartiality, due process, equal protection and establish Justice without scapegoating because, on appeals against such errors, even the Supreme Court of the United States (“SCOTUS”) rarely grants petitions made for seeking such reversals and corrections.
Criminal MatterCriminal Court
People v. Onuorah
In this case, the public prosecutor failed to charge the motorist under the right section and Judge Zoll first convicted him for void closing and then made prompt self-correction to acquit him for valid closing.