Gold and black circular emblem with K logo and text reading Learn in Truth Knowing Justice Always transparent sun rays border
Pragmatic Home Page to Pragmatic LKJMOL, dated 08.10.2026 and updated 11.02.2026, from the Law Offices of Lalit K Jain Esq: Law continues due process of law until Courts end scapegoatings and scammings as Injustices; all people are free to use and attach the pragmatic Memorandum of Law (LKJMOL) scripted by Lalit K Jain Esq (LKJESQ), which reminds all courts to administer equal justice under law. Signed Lalit K Jain Esq.
View this page as PDF
Pragmatic LKJMOL by LKJESQ, dated 08.10.2026 and updated 11.02.2026: scripted by Lalit K Jain Esq (LKJESQ), this pragmatic Memorandum of Law (LKJMOL) does not create attorney-client relationships, guarantees, and/or duties when used in and attached to legal briefs, yet reminds all courts to administer equal justice under law and not to perpetuate Injustices by applying inapplicable laws to fictions as facts, but to apply applicable laws to facts as truths, with footnotes citing People v Onuorah, the ABA Model Rules, Michoud v Girod, Hammond v Hopkins, Elliott v Lessee of Piersol, Riggs v Palmer, Imperator Realty Co. v Tull, and SCOTUS Rule 10. Signed Lalit K Jain Esq.
View the LKJMOL as PDF
About the Founder

Lalit K. Jain, Esq.

Founder & Principal Attorney — Law Offices of Lalit K. Jain, Esq.

Older man with bald head wearing dark suit, white shirt, and blue tie against gray background

Lalit K. Jain, Esq. is an attorney who scripted the pragmatic Memorandum of Law (“LKJMOL”) for use in their legal briefs by all litigants (both pro se or self-represented and represented by lawyers) to help courts, with no right to commit or perpetuate scapegoatings (blaming others for wrongdoings they did not commit) and other Injustices even if courts scapegoat LKJESQ for this legal help. End abusing discretion to apply inapplicable laws to fictions as facts like marital presumptions for Injustices perpetuating unlawful unpragmatic jurisprudence (“JIP”). Use discretion to apply applicable laws to facts as truths like DNA-matches for equal justice under law to perpetuate lawful pragmatic truthisprudence (“TIP”).

Need Legal Representation?

If you believe you are still enduring Injustices perpetuated by the courts, then, please click Review My Case and send Case Review Request. We help all litigants: both pro se or self-represented and represented by lawyers.

Review My Case

Contact

Credentials & Experience

Education

  • B.L.(Hons), Gold Medalist — graduated at the top of his law school class, achieving academic distinction beyond traditional honors classifications.

Professional Designations

  • Creator of Truthisprudence® — a legal philosophy helping courts to apply applicable laws.
  • Author of the Pragmatic Memorandum of Law (“LKJMOL”) — a memorandum for legal briefs helping courts to apply applicable laws.

Admissions

  • New York State Courts
  • Courts in India
  • U.S. District Courts
  • U.S. Tax Court
  • Supreme Court of the United States

Practice Areas

  • All areas of law.
Request a Case ReviewCall 718-316-5921

In all following cases, courts, with no right to commit or perpetuate scapegoatings (blaming others for wrongdoings they did not commit) and other Injustices committed or perpetuated scapegoatings and other Injustices.

Criminal MatterCriminal Court

People v. Onuorah

In this case, the public prosecutor failed to charge the motorist under the right section and Judge Zoll first convicted him for void closing and then made prompt self-correction to acquit him for valid closing.

View Case Details