Gold and black circular emblem with K logo and text reading Learn in Truth Knowing Justice Always transparent sun rays border
World's First and Only Pragmatic Home Page, dated 08.10.2026 and updated 10.31.2026, from the Law Offices of Lalit K Jain Esq: Law continues due process of law until Courts end scapegoatings and scammings as Injustices; unpragmatic jurisprudence (JIP) inspired Lalit K Jain Esq (LKJESQ) to invent pragmatic truthisprudence (TIP), so both sexes can live safe and sound before, during and after due process of law. Signed Lalit K Jain Esq.
View this page as PDF
Memorandum of Law (LKJMOL) from the Law Offices of Lalit K Jain Esq, updated 10.31.2026: a pragmatic reminder that due process continues until courts end scapegoating and scams as injustices; that discretion should apply applicable law to truth (truthisprudence, TIP) rather than inapplicable law to falsehood (jurisprudence, JIP); that lack of jurisdiction or abuse of due process may render judgments void; and that courts should order reparative relief against those profiting from their own wrongs. Signed by Lalit K Jain, with six footnotes citing People v Onuorah, the ABA Model Rules, Demjanjuk v Petrovsky, Michoud v Girod, Hammond v Hopkins, Elliott v Lessee of Piersol, Riggs v Palmer, Imperator Realty Co. v Tull, and SCOTUS Rule 10.
About the Founder

Lalit K. Jain, Esq.

Founder & Principal Attorney — Law Offices of Lalit K. Jain, Esq.

Older man with bald head wearing dark suit, white shirt, and blue tie against gray background

Lalit K. Jain, Esq. is an attorney who scripted the pragmatic Memorandum of Law (“LKJMOL”) for use in their legal briefs by all litigants (both pro se or self-represented and represented by lawyers) to help courts, with no right to commit or perpetuate scapegoatings (blaming others for wrongdoings they did not commit) and other Injustices even if courts scapegoat LKJESQ for this legal help. End abusing discretion to apply inapplicable laws to fictions as facts like marital presumptions for Injustices perpetuating unlawful unpragmatic jurisprudence (“JIP”). Use discretion to apply applicable laws to facts as truths like DNA-matches for equal justice under law to perpetuate lawful pragmatic truthisprudence (“TIP”).

Need Legal Representation?

If you believe you are still enduring Injustices perpetuated by the courts, then, please click Review My Case and send Case Review Request. We help all litigants: both pro se or self-represented and represented by lawyers.

Review My Case

Contact

Credentials & Experience

Education

  • B.L.(Hons), Gold Medalist — graduated at the top of his law school class, achieving academic distinction beyond traditional honors classifications.

Professional Designations

  • Creator of Truthisprudence® — a legal philosophy helping courts to apply applicable laws.
  • Author of the Pragmatic Memorandum of Law (“LKJMOL”) — a memorandum for legal briefs helping courts to apply applicable laws.

Admissions

  • New York State Courts
  • Courts in India
  • U.S. District Courts
  • U.S. Tax Court
  • Supreme Court of the United States

Practice Areas

  • All areas of law.
Request a Case ReviewCall 718-316-5921

In all following cases, courts, with no right to commit or perpetuate scapegoatings (blaming others for wrongdoings they did not commit) and other Injustices committed or perpetuated scapegoatings and other Injustices.

Criminal MatterCriminal Court

People v. Onuorah

In this case, the public prosecutor failed to charge the motorist under the right section and Judge Zoll first convicted him for void closing and then made prompt self-correction to acquit him for valid closing.

View Case Details
Civil — MalpracticeCivil Court

Jassal v. Jain

Both the licensed architect and the Village of Irvington Architectural Review Board violated building laws and issued building permit to build the home 8 feet higher from the street, threatened criminal action against the owner for building an eyesore, scapegoated the owner and forced him to prevent incarceration and donate the home to the Village that the Village sold to innocent buyers the same home that was uninhabitable as having been built unsafe in violation of building laws.

View Case Details
Surrogate's CourtSurrogate's Court

Estate of Michael A. Roma

A civil estate matter where a questioned ruling highlights the systemic danger of flawed judgments going unchallenged or uncorrected.

View Case Details
International PrecedentIndia

Indian Judicial Decision

A referenced Indian ruling showing that the idea of truth as jurisprudence's foundation crosses national and legal boundaries.

View Case Details